Part 2 cue cardSocial media and communication
Describe an interesting conversation you had
The trap is replaying the conversation line by line, which eats the time and invites errors. Summarise it with reported speech ("she explained that...") and save time for "why it was interesting": one idea you took away.
- 1 minute to prepare
- Up to 2 minutes
- Samples at Band 6, 7 and 8
- Updated 20 October 2026

The cue card
Describe an interesting conversation you had.
You should say:
- who you spoke with
- what you talked about
- where it took place
- and explain why it was interesting
Rehearse the long turn
1 minute to prepare · 2 minutes to speak
A 60-second plan
- who you spoke withMrs Li, retired terracotta warrior restorer
- what you talked aboutfragments, jigsaws, paint flaking in minutes
- where it took placehigh-speed train, Chengdu to Xi'an
- and explain why it was interestingmuseum next day felt human
Sample answers
Band 6 sample answer
224 words · about 1:57 spoken at a Band 6 pace
I'd like to talk about a conversation I had last autumn with an old lady called Mrs Li. I didn't know her before, she was just the person sitting next to me. She is about seventy, and she was going to visit her grandson.
We talked about her job. She told me that she worked for more than thirty years in Xi'an, repairing the terracotta warriors. I was very surprised, because I always thought the soldiers were found complete, but she said that most of them was broken into many pieces, so the workers have to put them together like a puzzle. She also told me that when they dig out a soldier, the colours on it disappear only in few minutes, because of the air.
The conversation took place in a high-speed train from Chengdu to Xi'an. It's about three hours and a half, so we had a lot of time. I was going there with my classmates for a trip to see the museum.
It was interesting because the next day, when I saw the warriors in the museum, I looked at them with a different eyes. Before, they were just a famous tourist place for me, but after talking with her I was thinking about all the people who worked so hard for many years. She made the history more alive.
The mistakes that keep it at Band 6
- most of them was broken should be most of them were broken
- the workers have to put them together should be the workers had to put them together
- disappear only in few minutes should be disappear in only a few minutes
- in a high-speed train should be on a high-speed train
- about three hours and a half should be about three and a half hours
- with a different eyes should be with different eyes
- a famous tourist place should be a famous tourist attraction
- She made the history more alive should be She brought the history to life
Why this is Band 6, not Band 7
- Fluency and coherence
- Willing and clear, covering the bullets in order with some useful reporting ("She told me that", "she said that"). It stays at Band 6 because the linking is repetitive ("She also told me", "so"), and the last bullet ends on a vague idea instead of developing it.
- Vocabulary
- Enough vocabulary for the topic ("terracotta warriors", "repairing", "put them together like a puzzle"), but some choices are awkward: "a famous tourist place" and "made the history more alive" are not natural collocations. Band 7 needs more precise, less common items.
- Grammar
- Reports what was said, which is ambitious, but the reported clauses carry the errors: "most of them was broken", "the workers have to put" without a shift into the past, and "only in few minutes" with the article missing. That frequency in complex sentences is Band 6.
Pronunciation is the fourth criterion; it is judged from your voice, so a written sample cannot show it.
Band 7 sample answer
254 words · about 1:57 spoken at a Band 7 pace
I want to describe a conversation I had last autumn with a complete stranger, a retired woman in her seventies called Mrs Li, who happened to have the seat next to mine.
It turned out she'd spent over thirty years as a restorer at the terracotta warriors site in Xi'an, and that's what we talked about, almost non-stop. I'd always assumed the warriors were dug up more or less intact, but she explained that nearly all of them were found in fragments and had to be pieced together, sometimes from hundreds of bits, like enormous jigsaw. The thing that amazed me most was when she described how the original paint would curl up and flake off within minutes of being exposed to the air, so the team sometimes had to watch the colours vanish in front of them.
We were on the high-speed train from Chengdu to Xi'an, which takes about three and a half hours, so there was plenty of time to talk. I was heading there with a few classmates on a study trip, and of course our main stop was the museum.
What made it so interesting was the effect it had on me the following day. When I actually stood in front of the warriors, I didn't just see a famous tourist attraction any more; I kept thinking about the people like her who'd spent decades on their knees, matching up pieces of clay. In a way, she made history feel like something human, not just a list of dates.
The slips
- like enormous jigsaw should be like an enormous jigsaw
Why this is Band 7, not Band 8
- Fluency and coherence
- Speaks at length without effort and summarises the conversation instead of replaying it ("she explained that", "she described how"). Not Band 8 because the bullets are taken strictly one at a time, so the setting arrives after the content and slightly interrupts the story.
- Vocabulary
- Some less common and precise vocabulary: "pieced together", "curl up and flake off", "on their knees", "matching up pieces of clay". Band 8 would sustain this precision in plainer stretches such as "plenty of time to talk".
- Grammar
- A good range, mostly accurate: reported speech with passives ("were found in fragments and had to be pieced together"), "would" for a repeated past process, a past perfect in a relative clause. One slip: "like enormous jigsaw" drops the article.
Pronunciation is the fourth criterion; it is judged from your voice, so a written sample cannot show it.
Band 8 sample answer
278 words · about 1:55 spoken at a Band 8 pace
The most interesting conversation I've had in a long time was with a stranger: a retired woman in her seventies, Mrs Li, who ended up beside me on a train last autumn and turned out to be wonderful company.
Within about ten minutes it emerged that she'd spent more than thirty years as a restorer at the terracotta army pits in Xi'an, and from then on I could hardly stop asking questions. She explained that, contrary to what most people imagine, almost none of the warriors came out of the ground whole; they were found smashed into fragments and painstakingly reassembled, sometimes from several hundred pieces. What really stayed with me, though, was her account of the paint. Apparently, the original colours were so fragile that, once exposed to the air, they would curl and peel away within minutes, and she described standing helplessly in a pit, watching a face lose its colour while the team rushed to preserve it.
All this took place on the high-speed line from Chengdu to Xi'an, a journey of about three and a half hours, which gave us time to talk properly. I was travelling with a few classmates on a study trip, with the museum as the highlight.
Why did it fascinate me so much? Mainly because of what happened the next day. Standing in front of those rows of soldiers, I found I wasn't looking at a monument any more; I was picturing people like her, kneeling in the dust for years, coaxing a face back together from fragments. She'd turned something I knew from textbooks into a story about human patience, and I think that's what good conversations do.
Why this is Band 8, not Band 9
- Fluency and coherence
- Fluent and fully coherent; the conversation is summarised selectively and the last bullet is introduced with a natural rhetorical question ("Why did it fascinate me so much?"). Band 9 would integrate the setting more smoothly than the slightly abrupt "All this took place".
- Vocabulary
- Wide and precise: "painstakingly reassembled", "curl and peel away", "standing helplessly in a pit", "coaxing a face back together". The gap to Band 9 is that a few phrases, such as "wonderful company", are conventional rather than striking.
- Grammar
- Flexible and accurate: reported speech with a passive, a result clause ("so fragile that") wrapped around a participle ("once exposed to the air"), "would" for a repeated past process, and a past perfect to close. No errors.
Pronunciation is the fourth criterion; it is judged from your voice, so a written sample cannot show it.
Rounding-off questions
- Is the art of conversation being lost?
- I don't think it's lost, but it's out of practice. People message more than they talk, so they're less used to listening patiently and asking follow-up questions, which is what made that conversation so good.
- Do people talk face to face less than before?
- Yes, I'd say so, especially young people, who often find texting easier. Ironically, on that train the only reason we started talking was that both our phones had lost signal in the mountains.
Phrases worth reusing
turned out to be wonderful company
proved very pleasant to spend time with
pieced together
assembled from many small parts
contrary to what most people imagine
the truth is different from the common belief
painstakingly reassembled
put back together slowly and with great care
What really stayed with me
what I kept remembering afterwards
time to talk properly
enough time for a real, unhurried conversation
from then on
from that moment onwards
If the obvious answer doesn't fit
- A long talk with a grandparent about their childhood
- A discussion with a teacher or colleague that changed your mind
- A chat with a taxi driver or stranger who had an unusual job


