Part 2 cue cardChildhood and memories
Describe a game or activity you enjoyed as a child
The trap is the first bullet: explaining the rules of a game can swallow a whole minute. Give the idea in two or three sentences, then spend the time on the people, the place and why it was fun, with used to and would for past habits.
- 1 minute to prepare
- Up to 2 minutes
- Samples at Band 6, 7 and 8
- Updated 20 October 2026

The cue card
Describe a game or activity you enjoyed as a child.
You should say:
- what the game was
- who you played it with
- where you usually played
- and explain why you enjoyed it
Rehearse the long turn
1 minute to prepare · 2 minutes to speak
A 60-second plan
- what the game wasô ăn quan: chalk squares, pebbles
- who you played it withcousin Linh; Tuấn the cheat
- where you usually playedalley behind Grandma's house, Huế
- and explain why you enjoyed itfree, tactical, arguments, chè at dusk
Sample answers
Band 6 sample answer
229 words · about 1:59 spoken at a Band 6 pace
When I was small kid, my favourite game was ô ăn quan. It is a traditional game in Vietnam and you play it with small stones. First you draw ten squares on the ground and two big half circle in the end. Then each player take the stones from one square and put them one by one in the other squares, and if you are lucky you can win the stones of your friend.
I played this game with my cousin Linh and also with a boy in my street, his name was Tuấn. He was not a good loser and sometimes he cheated, so we always had arguments.
Usually we played in a small alley behind the house of my grandmother in Huế. There was a big starfruit tree, so it was not so hot there. We drew the squares on the ground by a stick, and when it was raining we played inside on the kitchen floor with chalk.
I enjoyed this game because it was free, we didn't need to buy anything. Also you need to think a lot before you move, so I think it made my brain more better for maths. But the best part was the time with my friends. After the game my grandmother always gave us sweet soup, and we forgot about the fighting. I still miss those days very much.
The mistakes that keep it at Band 6
- When I was small kid should be When I was a small kid
- two big half circle in the end should be two big half circles at the ends
- each player take should be each player takes
- win the stones of your friend should be win your friend's stones
- the house of my grandmother should be my grandmother's house
- by a stick should be with a stick
- made my brain more better for maths should be made me better at maths
Why this is Band 6, not Band 7
- Fluency and coherence
- Willing to extend and covers every bullet in order, with the rules explained briefly enough to leave time for the rest. Not Band 7 because the connectives are basic ("First", "Then", "Also", "But") and the reasons are listed rather than developed into a picture of those afternoons.
- Vocabulary
- Enough vocabulary for the topic ("traditional game", "alley", "chalk", "arguments"), but some choices are inaccurate or awkward: "made my brain more better for maths" is an unnatural way to make the point, and "win the stones of your friend" is clumsy. Band 7 needs more precise words.
- Grammar
- A mix of simple and complex sentences, with errors where the structures get harder: "each player take" misses the agreement, "the house of my grandmother" avoids the possessive, "by a stick" has the wrong preposition, and "more better" doubles the comparative. That frequency is Band 6.
Pronunciation is the fourth criterion; it is judged from your voice, so a written sample cannot show it.
Band 7 sample answer
263 words · about 2:01 spoken at a Band 7 pace
I'd like to describe a traditional Vietnamese game called ô ăn quan, which I used to play almost every day when I was about seven or eight. It's played on a board of ten squares that you draw on the ground, with a bigger space at each end, and you use small stones or seeds. Players take turns picking up the stones from one square and dropping them one at a time into the next squares, and the aim is to capture as many as possible.
I usually played with my cousin Linh and a boy called Tuấn, who lived on the same street. Tuấn was a terrible loser, to be honest, and he often tried to cheat when he thought we weren't looking.
We'd normally play in the little alley behind my grandmother's house in Huế. There was a starfruit tree there, so it stayed quite cool even in the afternoon. We just drew the board in the dirt with a stick, and if it was raining, we'd move inside and draw it with chalk on the floor of her kitchen.
There were a few reasons why I enjoyed it so much. First, you didn't need any equipment, so we could play whenever we wanted. It also involved quite a lot of strategy, because you had to plan your moves carefully, and I think it actually helped me for maths at school. But mostly I loved it because of the atmosphere: we'd argue constantly, then my grandmother would call us in for a bowl of sweet soup, and everything would be forgotten.
The slips
- helped me for maths should be helped me with maths
Why this is Band 7, not Band 8
- Fluency and coherence
- Speaks at length easily, with a clear route through the bullets and some flexible linking ("to be honest", "There were a few reasons", "But mostly"). Not Band 8 because the explanation of the rules is a little long and the reasons are numbered rather than woven into the story.
- Vocabulary
- Some less common, natural vocabulary ("a terrible loser", "quite a lot of strategy", "everything would be forgotten") and a clear paraphrase of the rules. Band 8 would show more idiom and more precise description of the place.
- Grammar
- A range of complex structures, mostly accurate: "used to" and "would" for past habits, a passive ("It's played on a board"), a condition ("if it was raining"). One slip, "helped me for maths", where the verb takes with.
Pronunciation is the fourth criterion; it is judged from your voice, so a written sample cannot show it.
Band 8 sample answer
271 words · about 1:52 spoken at a Band 8 pace
The game I loved most as a child was something called ô ăn quan, a traditional Vietnamese game that's a bit like a simplified version of mancala. You draw a row of ten squares on the ground with a semicircle at each end, put a handful of pebbles in each square, and then take it in turns to scoop up the stones from one square and drop them one by one along the board. If you land in the right place, you capture everything in the next square, and whoever ends up with the most stones wins.
I mostly played it with my cousin Linh, who was the same age as me, and a boy from a few doors down called Tuấn, who was famous in our neighbourhood for counting his pebbles with remarkable creativity.
We'd play in the narrow alley behind my grandmother's house in Huế, crouched in the shade of a starfruit tree. The board was scratched into the dirt with a stick, and when it rained we'd simply redraw it in chalk on her tiled kitchen floor, which she pretended not to notice.
Looking back, I think I enjoyed it because it was the perfect mixture of luck and cunning. It cost nothing, a game could last ten minutes or an entire afternoon, and you had to think several moves ahead, which I'm convinced is why I ended up loving maths. But honestly, half the fun was the arguing. Every game ended in a heated debate about whether Tuấn had cheated, and then my grandmother would call us in for sweet soup and we'd forget all about it.
Why this is Band 8, not Band 9
- Fluency and coherence
- Fluent and coherent: the rules take three efficient sentences, and the answer builds to a vivid conclusion about the arguing and the sweet soup. Short of Band 9 only because "Looking back" and "But honestly" are familiar markers.
- Vocabulary
- Wide, precise and witty: "counting his pebbles with remarkable creativity", "the perfect mixture of luck and cunning", "a heated debate", "crouched in the shade". Band 9 would sustain this command in the more mechanical description of the board.
- Grammar
- A wide range used accurately: "would" for repeated past action ("We'd play"), a participle clause ("crouched in the shade of a starfruit tree"), a past perfect in reported doubt ("whether Tuấn had cheated"). No errors; Band 9 would vary sentence openings more.
Pronunciation is the fourth criterion; it is judged from your voice, so a written sample cannot show it.
Rounding-off questions
- How is children's play different today?
- It's much more organised and much more indoors. Children have scheduled activities and screens, and parents are understandably nervous about letting them roam the street, so the kind of unsupervised afternoon we had is fairly rare now.
- Do children spend too much time on screens?
- Many do, although screens aren't all bad: some games are genuinely creative. The problem is when they replace running around and playing face to face, because that's how children learn to argue and then make up again.
Phrases worth reusing
take it in turns
do something one after another
a terrible loser
someone who gets angry when they lose
mixture of luck and cunning
a balance of chance and clever planning
a heated debate
an angry, emotional argument
half the fun
a large part of the enjoyment
think several moves ahead
plan for what will happen later
pretended not to notice
acted as if she hadn't seen it
If the obvious answer doesn't fit
- A street sport, such as football with a makeshift ball and goals
- A video game you played with a brother, sister or friends
- A make-believe game, like playing shop, school or house




