Part 2 cue cardPeople and relationships
Describe a person you enjoy talking to
The last bullet is about conversation, not friendship: say what makes talking to them different, such as how they listen, disagree or make you think, with one real exchange as proof. "How often" deserves a pattern, not one word.
- 1 minute to prepare
- Up to 2 minutes
- Samples at Band 6, 7 and 8
- Updated 20 October 2026

The cue card
Describe a person you enjoy talking to.
You should say:
- who the person is
- what you talk about
- how often you talk
- and explain why you enjoy talking to them
Rehearse the long turn
1 minute to prepare · 2 minutes to speak
A 60-second plan
- who the person isSipho, ex-flatmate, now in Cape Town
- what you talk aboutfootball rivalry, books, politics, silly debates
- how often you talkSunday-night calls, voice notes midweek
- and explain why you enjoy talking to themlistens, disagrees kindly, changed my plan
Sample answers
Band 6 sample answer
226 words · about 1:58 spoken at a Band 6 pace
The person who I enjoy talking to the most is my friend Sipho. We were roommates at university in Johannesburg for three years, but after we graduated he moved to Cape Town for a job, so now we live very far from each other.
We talk about everything. Of course football, because he supports Orlando Pirates and I support Kaizer Chiefs, so we are always arguing. But we also talk about books, politics and our plans of the future. Sometimes we discuss about really stupid things, for example last month we argued for one hour if a hot dog is a sandwich.
Every Sunday night we make a long conversation on the phone, normally one hour or more. During the week we send voice notes to each other, sometimes they are five minutes long, which is a bit crazy.
I enjoy talking to him because he is a really good listener. When I tell him something, he asks questions and he remember small details from weeks before. Also he is not afraid to disagree with me, but he never makes it personal. For example, when I wanted to quit my job last year, everybody told me it's a great idea, but Sipho asked me very difficult questions and in the end I changed my mind. After our conversations I always feel more clearer in my head.
The mistakes that keep it at Band 6
- our plans of the future should be our plans for the future
- we discuss about really stupid things should be we discuss really stupid things
- argued for one hour if a hot dog should be argued for an hour about whether a hot dog
- we make a long conversation should be we have a long conversation
- he remember small details should be he remembers small details
- everybody told me it's a great idea should be everybody told me it was a great idea
- I always feel more clearer should be I always feel clearer
Why this is Band 6, not Band 7
- Fluency and coherence
- Speaks at length and answers every bullet, with a useful example for the last one ("when I wanted to quit my job last year"). It stays at Band 6 because the reasons are added with "Also", and the answer moves through the bullets as separate blocks rather than one connected picture.
- Vocabulary
- Clear everyday vocabulary ("roommates", "voice notes", "good listener"), but some combinations are not natural: "we make a long conversation" uses the wrong verb, and "plans of the future" the wrong preposition. Band 7 would bring in less common, more idiomatic items.
- Grammar
- Mixes simple and complex sentences, with relative clauses and reported speech, but errors are frequent: "everybody told me it's a great idea" does not backshift, "he remember" drops the verb ending, and "more clearer" doubles the comparative.
Pronunciation is the fourth criterion; it is judged from your voice, so a written sample cannot show it.
Band 7 sample answer
261 words · about 2:00 spoken at a Band 7 pace
I'd have to say my friend Sipho. We shared a flat for three years while we were studying in Johannesburg, and after graduation he took a job in Cape Town, so these days we're about fourteen hundred kilometres apart.
We talk about pretty much everything. Football takes up a worrying amount of time, because he's a Pirates fan and I support Chiefs, so there's always something to wind each other up about. But we'll also get into books we're reading, what's going on in the politics, and where we both want to be in five years. And every so often we'll spend an entire evening on something completely pointless; last month we argued for nearly an hour about whether a hot dog counts as a sandwich.
We've got a standing arrangement to call every Sunday night, and those calls rarely last less than an hour. In between, we fire voice notes back and forth, some of them so long they're basically podcasts.
The reason I enjoy talking to him is that he actually listens. He'll bring up something I mentioned weeks before, which makes you feel that what you say matters. He's also not afraid to disagree. Last year, when I was about to resign from my job on impulse, everyone else said 'go for it', whereas Sipho kept asking awkward questions until I realised I was running away from a bad manager rather than towards anything better. I came off that call with a completely different plan. That's the thing; I always hang up seeing things a bit more clearly.
The slips
- in the politics should be in politics
Why this is Band 7, not Band 8
- Fluency and coherence
- Speaks at length without effort, with flexible links ("But we'll also", "every so often", "In between") and a strong example for the last bullet. Not Band 8 because the final line ("That's the thing") wraps up a little abruptly instead of drawing the threads together.
- Vocabulary
- Some less common and idiomatic language: "wind each other up", "a standing arrangement", "fire voice notes back and forth", "on impulse". Band 8 would be precise throughout; "pretty much everything" and "completely pointless" are safe choices.
- Grammar
- A good range, mostly accurate: "we'll" for typical behaviour, a contrast with whereas, "running away from a bad manager rather than towards anything better". One slip, "in the politics", where a general subject takes no article.
Pronunciation is the fourth criterion; it is judged from your voice, so a written sample cannot show it.
Band 8 sample answer
280 words · about 1:56 spoken at a Band 8 pace
Without a doubt it's my friend Sipho. We shared a cramped flat in Johannesburg all the way through university, and when he landed a job in Cape Town after graduating, I was worried we'd drift apart. If anything, the opposite happened.
Our conversations range all over the place. A ridiculous proportion is football, since he's a die-hard Pirates supporter and I'm a Chiefs man, which gives us endless ammunition. But we'll just as easily drift into whatever we're reading, the state of the country, or where we each see ourselves in a few years. And now and then we'll pour an entire evening into something utterly trivial; we once spent almost an hour debating whether a hot dog qualifies as a sandwich, and neither of us has backed down since.
There's an unwritten rule that we speak every Sunday night, and those calls seldom wrap up in under an hour. During the week we keep up a running exchange of voice notes, some of which go on so long they'd qualify as podcasts.
What makes talking to him such a pleasure is that he genuinely listens, which is rarer than it should be. He'll pick up on a throwaway comment I made a fortnight earlier and ask how it turned out. He's also prepared to tell me what I don't want to hear. When I was on the verge of quitting my job on a whim last year, everyone else cheered me on, but Sipho gently kept probing until I admitted I was escaping a difficult manager rather than heading for anything better. I always come away from our calls thinking more clearly than when I picked up the phone.
Why this is Band 8, not Band 9
- Fluency and coherence
- Effortless and coherent; it opens with a small twist ("If anything, the opposite happened") and closes by answering the last bullet exactly. Band 9 would make a few transitions less conventional than "But" and "And now and then".
- Vocabulary
- Wide and idiomatic: "endless ammunition", "a throwaway comment", "on the verge of quitting my job on a whim", "kept probing". Band 9 would bring that precision to plainer stretches such as "Our conversations range all over the place".
- Grammar
- Flexible and accurate: "some of which go on so long", a comparison ("rarer than it should be"), "I was worried we'd drift apart" for a past expectation. No errors; Band 9 would range slightly further.
Pronunciation is the fourth criterion; it is judged from your voice, so a written sample cannot show it.
Rounding-off questions
- Is conversation as important as it used to be?
- I'd say it's more important, precisely because there's less of it. So much communication is short messages now that a proper conversation, where someone listens and responds, has become quite valuable.
- What makes someone a good conversationalist?
- Mostly curiosity. Good conversationalists ask follow-up questions and remember what you told them. Being funny helps, but someone who really listens is always better company than someone waiting for their turn to talk.
Phrases worth reusing
wind each other up
tease each other to get a reaction
a standing arrangement
a regular plan that doesn't need confirming
on impulse
suddenly, without planning or thinking
drift apart
gradually become less close
a throwaway comment
a remark made casually, without much thought
on the verge of
very close to doing something
endless ammunition
an unlimited supply of things to tease each other about
If the obvious answer doesn't fit
- A grandparent whose stories about the past you could listen to for hours
- A colleague or classmate whose views are completely different from yours
- A barber, shopkeeper or driver you chat with every week




