Skills and success: IELTS Speaking Part 3 questions & answers
The discussion after the long turn: broader questions where you give views and reasons. Every question has a Band 8 sample built the way its type needs.
- 9 questions with sample answers
- 6 question types
- The examiner's voice on every question

Skills and success
9 questions · Part 3
Take it as a mock interview
9 questions · 60 seconds each · about 10 minutes
Opening question
Warm-up
What kinds of skills do you think are most useful in life today?
Sample answerBand 8AnswerReasonExample
- Answer
- Reason
- Example
Beyond the obvious technical ones, I'd single out communication and the ability to adapt. Almost every job now involves working with others and coping with constant change, so people who can explain their ideas clearly and adjust when plans fall apart have a real edge. Someone who can calmly talk a frustrated client round is often worth more to a company than a brilliant specialist who can't.
- single out
- choose one thing for special attention
- have a real edge
- have a clear advantage
- talk a frustrated client round
- persuade an annoyed customer to feel better
67 words · about 29 seconds spoken
Warm-up: close to home
- 2
Compare
Is it easier to learn new skills as a child or as an adult?
Sample answerBand 8ThenNowWhy it changed
- Then
- Now
- Why it changed
As children, we pick things up with remarkable ease. A child can absorb a second language or learn to swim without any apparent effort, partly because they're not afraid of looking foolish. Adults, by contrast, tend to find it harder, not necessarily because their brains are slower but because they're juggling work and family and have far less time to practise. Mindset makes a difference too. Children treat mistakes as part of the game, whereas adults are often so self-conscious that they give up too soon. Still, adults do understand why they're learning, and they can use strategies a child would never think of.
- pick things up
- learn something easily, without formal study
- by contrast
- when compared with the other
- part of the game
- a normal part of the activity
104 words · about 45 seconds spoken
Development: society
- 3
Cause and effect
Why do some skills become more valuable over time while others fade away?
Sample answerBand 8Main causeAnother causeEffect
- Main cause
- Another cause
- Effect
Technology is the main driver. Once a machine can do something faster and cheaper, the human skill behind it loses its market value, which is what happened to typists and is arguably happening to some translators now. Changing social habits matter as well. Hardly anyone needs to darn socks or write in elegant handwriting any more, simply because those things are no longer part of everyday life. The knock-on effect is that skills machines struggle with, such as empathy, persuasion and creative problem solving, are becoming increasingly prized, and people who rely solely on routine expertise are finding themselves exposed.
- the main driver
- the most important cause
- The knock-on effect
- a result that follows from something else
- increasingly prized
- more and more valued
100 words · about 43 seconds spoken
- 4
Opinion
Do you think natural talent matters more than hard work?
Sample answerBand 8My viewWhyExampleBut
- My view
- Why
- Example
- But
On the whole, I'd say hard work matters more, at least for reaching a good level in most fields. Talent might give you a head start, but without sustained practice it rarely amounts to much, and plenty of gifted people coast along until others overtake them. You see it all the time in sport. The naturally gifted teenager often drops out, while the less spectacular one who trains every morning ends up playing professionally. At the very highest level, though, I'll admit talent becomes decisive. When everyone works obsessively hard, it's the tiny natural advantages that separate the best from the rest.
- a head start
- an advantage at the beginning
- coast along
- make progress without much effort
- You see it all the time
- this happens very often
102 words · about 44 seconds spoken
- 5
Opinion
How do people usually measure success in your country?
Sample answerBand 8My viewWhyExampleBut
- My view
- Why
- Example
- But
Sadly, I'd say success is still measured mainly in material terms, by your job title, your salary and whether you own a home or a car. Part of that comes from older generations who grew up with very little, so financial security naturally became the yardstick for a good life. At family gatherings, the first questions people get asked are almost always about where they work and how much they earn, rather than whether they're happy. Among younger people that's starting to shift, though. More of them talk about work-life balance and doing something meaningful, even if it pays less.
- in material terms
- in terms of money and possessions
- the yardstick for
- the standard used to judge
- starting to shift
- beginning to change
100 words · about 43 seconds spoken
- 6
Opinion
Should schools teach children how to cope with failure?
Sample answerBand 8My viewWhyExampleBut
- My view
- Why
- Example
- But
Definitely, because it's one of the most useful lessons anyone can learn, and at the moment it's left almost entirely to chance. Children who've only ever been praised can be devastated by their first real setback, whereas those who've learned that failing is part of improving tend to bounce back far more quickly. Something as simple as a teacher talking openly about a mistake they once made, and what they did next, can take the shame out of getting things wrong. The risk is that it becomes a box-ticking exercise, a single lesson on resilience slotted into the timetable, when what children need is a culture where failing is genuinely accepted.
- bounce back
- recover quickly after a difficulty
- take the shame out of
- stop something from feeling embarrassing
- a box-ticking exercise
- something done only to satisfy a rule
111 words · about 48 seconds spoken
Depth: the abstract and the future
- 7
Pros and cons
What are the downsides of a society that focuses heavily on success?
Sample answerBand 8UpsideDownsideOn balance
- Upside
- Downside
- On balance
To be fair, a strong focus on success does push people to work hard and aim high, and that ambition can drive innovation and economic growth. The darker side is the pressure it creates. Young people in particular can feel they're only worth something if they're top of the class or earning a fortune, which fuels anxiety and burnout. It also encourages people to look down on those in modest jobs, even though society couldn't function without them. So ambition is healthy in moderation, but when success becomes the only measure of a person's value, the costs start to outweigh the gains.
- aim high
- set ambitious goals
- look down on
- think someone is less important than you
- in moderation
- in reasonable, not excessive, amounts
102 words · about 44 seconds spoken
- 8
The future
How might the skills employers value change in the coming decades?
Sample answerBand 8PredictionBecauseBut
- Prediction
- Because
- But
I'd imagine employers will care less about what you already know and more about how quickly you can learn something new. Specific technical knowledge goes out of date so fast now that a qualification from ten years ago may be almost irrelevant, whereas someone who adapts readily stays useful whatever happens. Even so, I don't believe deep expertise will disappear as a selling point. Someone still has to understand how complex systems actually work, and companies will pay handsomely for that kind of specialist knowledge.
- goes out of date
- becomes old and no longer useful
- a selling point
- a feature that makes something attractive
- pay handsomely for
- pay a lot of money for
85 words · about 37 seconds spoken
- 9
What if
If money were no object, would people still try to achieve things?
Sample answerBand 8If soResultWider effect
- If so
- Result
- Wider effect
If money were no object, I'm convinced most people would still strive for something, although their goals might look rather different. Freed from the need to earn a living, some would throw themselves into art, research or volunteering, things they currently can't afford to pursue. A few might simply drift, of course, but I suspect boredom would set in fairly quickly. On a larger scale, it suggests that money isn't the deepest motive behind human achievement. Curiosity, pride and the desire to be respected are far more fundamental, which is why people climb mountains or write novels that will never make them rich.
- money were no object
- cost did not matter at all
- throw themselves into
- start doing something with great energy
- boredom would set in
- people would start to feel bored
103 words · about 45 seconds spoken







