Part 2 cue cardSkills and success
Describe a good leader you know or have heard about
Answers fail on the last bullet by listing adjectives. "What qualities they have" and "why they are a good leader" need different content: name the qualities briefly, then prove them with one decision under pressure and its effect on the team.
- 1 minute to prepare
- Up to 2 minutes
- Samples at Band 6, 7 and 8
- Updated 20 October 2026

The cue card
Describe a good leader you know or have heard about.
You should say:
- who the person is
- what they lead
- what qualities they have
- and explain why you think they are a good leader
Rehearse the long turn
1 minute to prepare · 2 minutes to speak
A 60-second plan
- who the person isPriya, my engineering manager, Bengaluru
- what they leadtwelve developers, payments app
- what qualities they havecalm, gives credit, asks quiet people
- and explain why you think they are a good leaderlaunch crash: took blame, shifts, no-blame review
Sample answers
Band 6 sample answer
229 words · about 1:59 spoken at a Band 6 pace
I'm going to talk about my manager, Priya. She is the head of the software team in the company where I work in Bengaluru. I joined there about two years ago as a junior developer.
She leads a team of twelve developers, and we make a mobile app for paying bills and sending money. It's a big responsibility, because millions of people is using the app every day.
She has a lot of good qualities. First of all, she is very calm, I never saw her shouting at anybody, even when there is a big problem. Second, when we do a good job she always gives the credit to the team, not to herself. And in meetings she asks the quiet people for their opinion first, so people like me, who are shy, can also speak.
I think she is a good leader because of what happened last Diwali. We launched a new feature and on the first day the app was crashed for six hours. Our CEO was very angry. But Priya told him that it was her responsible, not ours. Then she did a schedule so nobody worked more than ten hours, because she said tired people make more mistakes. After we fixed it, we had a meeting without blaming anybody, and we learned a lot. Since that time, honestly, everyone in the team trust her completely.
The mistakes that keep it at Band 6
- I joined there about two years ago should be I joined the company about two years ago
- millions of people is using should be millions of people use
- I never saw her shouting should be I've never seen her shout
- gives the credit to the team should be gives credit to the team
- the app was crashed should be the app crashed
- it was her responsible should be it was her responsibility
- she did a schedule should be she drew up a schedule
- everyone in the team trust her should be everyone in the team trusts her
Why this is Band 6, not Band 7
- Fluency and coherence
- Willing to speak at length and clearly organised ("First of all", "Second"), with a real example for the last bullet. It stays at Band 6 because the qualities are numbered like a list rather than linked to the story that proves them.
- Vocabulary
- Adequate for the topic ("junior developer", "feature", "CEO", "blaming"), but some word forms and combinations are off: "her responsible" uses the adjective for the noun, and "did a schedule" is not a natural collocation. Band 7 would choose more precise and less common words.
- Grammar
- Uses reported speech and relative clauses, but errors appear in most complex sentences: "millions of people is using" breaks agreement, "the app was crashed" makes an intransitive verb passive, and "I never saw her shouting" needs a present perfect for experience up to now.
Pronunciation is the fourth criterion; it is judged from your voice, so a written sample cannot show it.
Band 7 sample answer
264 words · about 2:02 spoken at a Band 7 pace
The leader I'd like to talk about is Priya Raman, who manages the engineering team at the fintech start-up where I've been working in Bengaluru for the past two years.
She's in charge of twelve developers, and between us we build and maintain a payments app that several million people use to pay bills and send money to their families. So when something goes wrong, it really matters.
In terms of qualities, the one that stands out is how composed she is. I've never once heard her raise her voice, even in the middle of a crisis. She's also very generous with credit; whenever the team gets praised, she makes sure the people who did the work are named. And she has this habit, in meetings, of asking the quieter members for their view before the louder ones dominate, which as a fairly shy person I really appreciate.
But what convinced me she's a genuinely good leader was last Diwali. We'd rolled out a new feature just before the festival sales, and on the first morning the whole app went down for six hours. Our CEO was furious, and Priya simply told him the decision to release had been hers and the responsibility was hers too. Then, instead of keeping everyone on their desks all night, she drew up a rota so that nobody worked more than ten hours, because, as she put it, exhausted engineers create new bugs. Once it was fixed, she ran a review where the only question was what went wrong, never who. Since then, I'd follow her almost anywhere.
The slips
- on their desks should be at their desks
Why this is Band 7, not Band 8
- Fluency and coherence
- Speaks at length easily, and the turn to the main evidence is well handled ("But what convinced me she's a genuinely good leader"). Not Band 8 because the qualities are still introduced in a fairly listed way ("She's also", "And she has this habit") before the story begins.
- Vocabulary
- Less common, natural items: "composed", "generous with credit", "rolled out a new feature", "drew up a rota". Band 8 would sustain this precision; "it really matters" is a plain way to express the stakes.
- Grammar
- A good range, mostly accurate: past perfect for the earlier release ("We'd rolled out"), reported speech, a conditional for willingness ("I'd follow her almost anywhere"). One slip, "on their desks", where the preposition should be at.
Pronunciation is the fourth criterion; it is judged from your voice, so a written sample cannot show it.
Band 8 sample answer
286 words · about 1:58 spoken at a Band 8 pace
I'd like to talk about Priya Raman, who heads up the engineering team at the fintech start-up in Bengaluru where I've worked since graduating, so I've been able to watch her leadership at close quarters for a couple of years now.
She's responsible for twelve developers, myself included, and for a payments app that millions of people rely on to settle bills and send money home. In other words, the stakes are high and our mistakes are very public.
Several qualities stand out. She's unshakeably calm; I've seen her field a furious phone call and then turn to us in exactly the tone she'd use to order lunch. She's meticulous about credit, to the point of correcting senior executives who praise her for work someone else did. And she has a deliberate habit of inviting the quietest people in a meeting to speak first, before the confident voices set the agenda, which has made a real difference to someone as reticent as me.
What persuaded me she's the real deal, though, was the night our app collapsed. We'd pushed out a new feature on the eve of the Diwali sales, and within hours the whole system was down. While the CEO was demanding names, Priya calmly told him the call to release had been hers, and so was the accountability. She then split us into shifts so that no one stayed on beyond ten hours, arguing that exhausted engineers only create fresh problems. And once the service was restored, she led a post-mortem in which blame was explicitly off the table. The outcome was that we trusted her more after the failure than before it, which I'd say is the clearest test of leadership there is.
Why this is Band 8, not Band 9
- Fluency and coherence
- Effortless and well structured: the stakes are set up early ("the stakes are high and our mistakes are very public") and the story pays them off, ending in a general point. Band 9 would vary the links slightly; "though" and "And once" are familiar.
- Vocabulary
- Wide and precise: "at close quarters", "field a furious phone call", "set the agenda", "blame was explicitly off the table". Band 9 would show the same exactness in neutral phrases such as "Several qualities stand out".
- Grammar
- Flexible and accurate: a relative clause with in which, a participle clause ("arguing that exhausted engineers"), inversion after so ("and so was the accountability"), a comparison across two points in time. No errors.
Pronunciation is the fourth criterion; it is judged from your voice, so a written sample cannot show it.
Rounding-off questions
- What makes a good leader?
- Someone people choose to follow, not just someone they have to obey. In practice that usually means staying calm, being honest when things go wrong, and putting the team's interests ahead of your own image.
- Are leaders born or made, in your view?
- Mostly made, I'd argue. Confidence may come naturally to some people, but the skills that matter, like listening and taking responsibility, are learned, often by watching good leaders and bad ones.
Phrases worth reusing
generous with credit
quick to praise others for their work
rolled out a new feature
released a new function to users
drew up a rota
made a schedule of shifts
at close quarters
from very near, in detail
set the agenda
decide what will be discussed
off the table
not being considered at all
the real deal
genuinely as good as it seems
If the obvious answer doesn't fit
- A sports captain or coach who got the best from an average team
- A head teacher or community organiser you've watched closely
- A historical figure, if you focus on decisions rather than biography




