Education and schools: IELTS Speaking Part 3 questions & answers

    The discussion after the long turn: broader questions where you give views and reasons. Every question has a Band 8 sample built the way its type needs.

    • 9 questions with sample answers
    • 6 question types
    • The examiner's voice on every question
    An empty classroom with rows of wooden desks, a clean chalkboard and morning light

    Education and schools

    9 questions · Part 3

    Take it as a mock interview

    9 questions · 60 seconds each · about 10 minutes

    Opening question

    Warm-up

    What do you think makes a school a good place to learn?

    1
    Get it scored
    Sample answerBand 8
    1. Answer
    2. Reason
    3. Example

    Above all, it's the teachers, and specifically whether they genuinely care about their pupils' progress. Children are quick to sense whether an adult is invested in them, and they usually try hard to live up to those expectations. I still remember a maths teacher who stayed behind after class to go over problems with anyone who was stuck, and her whole class ended up loving a subject most of us had dreaded.

    genuinely care about
    truly feel concern for
    live up to those expectations
    be as good as others hope
    stayed behind after class
    remained at school after the lesson ended

    72 words · about 31 seconds spoken

    Warm-up: close to home

    1. Cause and effect

      Why do some students do well at school while others struggle?

      2
      Get it scored
      Sample answerBand 8
      1. Main cause
      2. Another cause
      3. Effect

      Home background is probably the decisive factor. A child with a quiet place to study and parents who can help with homework starts with a huge advantage over one who's sharing a cramped room with three siblings. Learning styles matter too, because the conventional classroom rewards students who can sit still and absorb information by listening, which simply doesn't suit everyone. As a result, some perfectly capable children get labelled as weak early on, lose confidence and gradually stop trying, which turns the label into a self-fulfilling prophecy.

      the decisive factor
      the thing that most influences the result
      doesn't suit everyone
      is not right for all people
      a self-fulfilling prophecy
      a prediction that makes itself come true

      88 words · about 38 seconds spoken

    Development: society

    1. Compare

      How is education in your country different from how it was a generation ago?

      3
      Get it scored
      Sample answerBand 8
      1. Then
      2. Now
      3. Why it changed

      When my parents were at school, learning was largely a matter of memorising facts and reciting them back, and teachers were figures of absolute authority whom nobody dared question. Today there's far more emphasis on group work, presentations and project-based learning, and students are actively encouraged to ask questions and voice their opinions. That shift came about partly because employers complained that graduates couldn't think independently or collaborate, and partly because the internet made rote learning seem rather pointless when any fact is a quick search away.

      voice their opinions
      say what they think
      rote learning
      learning by repetition without understanding
      a quick search away
      easy to find online in seconds

      87 words · about 38 seconds spoken

    2. Opinion

      Do you think exams are a fair way to measure ability?

      4
      Get it scored
      Sample answerBand 8
      1. My view
      2. Why
      3. Example
      4. But

      Only up to a point, in my opinion. An exam measures how well you perform on one particular day under considerable pressure, which isn't quite the same thing as ability. Nerves, illness or a bad night's sleep can easily distort the result. I know people who were brilliant at coursework and discussions but went to pieces in the exam hall, and their grades never reflected what they could actually do. Exams do have one big advantage, though, which is that everyone sits the same paper under the same conditions, so they're much harder to manipulate than continuous assessment.

      up to a point
      partly but not completely
      went to pieces
      lost control because of stress
      under the same conditions
      in exactly the same situation as others

      98 words · about 43 seconds spoken

    3. Pros and cons

      What are the benefits and drawbacks of studying online rather than in a classroom?

      5
      Get it scored
      Sample answerBand 8
      1. Upside
      2. Downside
      3. On balance

      The obvious benefit is flexibility. People can fit courses around a job or family commitments, and someone in a remote village can access the same lectures as a student in the capital. On the other hand, it demands a great deal of self-discipline, and many learners drift away once the initial enthusiasm wears off. You also miss out on the informal conversations with classmates, which are often where real understanding happens. All things considered, online study suits motivated adults rather well, but for younger learners I'd still favour a physical classroom.

      the initial enthusiasm wears off
      the early excitement fades
      miss out on
      fail to experience something good
      All things considered
      after thinking about everything

      91 words · about 40 seconds spoken

    Depth: the abstract and the future

    1. Opinion

      Should governments spend more on education than on anything else?

      6
      Get it scored
      Sample answerBand 8
      1. My view
      2. Why
      3. Example
      4. But

      I'd be inclined to say yes, or at least that education should be close to the top of the list. It's one of the few investments that pays for itself, since a better educated population tends to be healthier, more productive and less likely to depend on state support. A number of countries that were relatively poor a few decades ago managed to transform their economies, at least in part, by pouring resources into schools and universities. Even so, it can't be an absolute rule. If hospitals are collapsing or people can't afford food, those needs obviously come first, and children can't learn properly when they're hungry or unwell anyway.

      pays for itself
      earns back more than it costs
      pouring resources into
      investing heavily in
      those needs obviously come first
      those needs clearly take priority

      110 words · about 48 seconds spoken

    2. The future

      How do you think schools will change as technology develops?

      7
      Get it scored
      Sample answerBand 8
      1. Prediction
      2. Because
      3. But

      My guess is that lessons will become far more personalised, with software adjusting the pace and difficulty of tasks to each individual pupil. That kind of tailoring is impossible for one teacher with thirty children, but adaptive software can already spot exactly where a student keeps going wrong. What I don't expect to change is the need for a human being at the front of the room. Schools aren't just about delivering content. They're also where children learn to get along with others, and no screen can teach that.

      My guess is that
      I predict that
      keeps going wrong
      repeatedly makes mistakes
      get along with others
      have friendly relationships with people

      89 words · about 39 seconds spoken

    3. What if

      If every child had a private tutor, would education improve?

      8
      Get it scored
      Sample answerBand 8
      1. If so
      2. Result
      3. Wider effect

      In purely academic terms, I imagine it would, because one-to-one teaching is about the most effective method there is. A tutor can spot a misunderstanding the moment it appears and fix it before it snowballs. The catch is that children might become overly reliant on having someone guide them through every problem, and they'd lose the chance to wrestle with something on their own, which is how resilience is built. Socially, it could also weaken schools as shared spaces, where children from very different backgrounds learn side by side and pick up skills that no tutor could ever provide.

      before it snowballs
      before it grows into a bigger problem
      overly reliant on
      depending too much on
      side by side
      together, next to each other

      99 words · about 43 seconds spoken

    4. Pros and cons

      Is it more important for schools to teach knowledge or to teach children how to think?

      9
      Get it scored
      Sample answerBand 8
      1. Upside
      2. Downside
      3. On balance

      The case for teaching thinking is strong. Facts can be looked up in seconds nowadays, whereas the ability to weigh evidence, question assumptions and solve unfamiliar problems is what makes someone genuinely capable. The trouble is that you can't think critically in a vacuum. Without a solid foundation of knowledge, there's nothing to think about, and students end up with confident opinions built on very little. So I'd say it's a false choice. Good teaching uses knowledge as the raw material for thinking, and the two develop together.

      in a vacuum
      without any connection to anything else
      a false choice
      a choice between things that are not really opposites
      the raw material for
      the basic substance something is made from

      88 words · about 38 seconds spoken

    Cue cards that lead into this discussion

    More Part 3 discussions