Transport and traffic: IELTS Speaking Part 3 questions & answers

    The discussion after the long turn: broader questions where you give views and reasons. Every question has a Band 8 sample built the way its type needs.

    • 9 questions with sample answers
    • 6 question types
    • The examiner's voice on every question
    Light trails of traffic along a city road at night seen from a bridge

    Transport and traffic

    9 questions · Part 3

    Take it as a mock interview

    9 questions · 60 seconds each · about 10 minutes

    Opening question

    Warm-up

    How do most people get around in your area?

    1
    Get it scored
    Sample answerBand 8
    1. Answer
    2. Reason
    3. Example

    Where I live, the main options are buses and motorbikes, although more families have been buying cars as incomes have gone up. The buses are cheap but crowded and not always reliable, so anyone who can afford their own transport tends to switch as soon as possible. My neighbour used to take two buses to his office, but last year he bought a scooter and now gets there in half the time.

    as incomes have gone up
    as people have started earning more
    anyone who can afford
    every person with enough money for it
    in half the time
    twice as quickly as before

    72 words · about 31 seconds spoken

    Warm-up: close to home

    1. Cause and effect

      Why do you think traffic has become such a problem in many cities?

      2
      Get it scored
      Sample answerBand 8
      1. Main cause
      2. Another cause
      3. Effect

      The root of it is that car ownership has grown far faster than road space, since as people become better off, a car is one of the first things they buy. Poor planning makes it worse, because when homes are built on the edge of a city with no decent public transport, people have no choice but to drive into the centre every day. The result is gridlock at rush hour, which wastes huge amounts of time, pollutes the air and eventually makes driving so unpleasant that the whole city starts looking for alternatives.

      The root of it is
      the basic cause of the problem is
      become better off
      become richer
      have no choice but to
      are forced to do something

      94 words · about 41 seconds spoken

    Development: society

    1. Compare

      How has the way people travel changed compared with the past?

      3
      Get it scored
      Sample answerBand 8
      1. Then
      2. Now
      3. Why it changed

      A generation or two ago, most people travelled on foot, by bicycle or on crowded trains, and a long journey was a major event that might be planned weeks in advance. Today, travel is far more frequent and casual, with people commuting long distances by car and flying abroad for a weekend break without thinking twice about it. Rising incomes and cheaper flights explain a lot of it, but so does the internet, because booking a trip or checking a route now takes seconds, which has made distance feel much less of a barrier.

      planned weeks in advance
      organised many weeks before it happened
      without thinking twice about it
      without hesitating or considering it carefully
      much less of a barrier
      a smaller obstacle than before

      94 words · about 41 seconds spoken

    2. Pros and cons

      Do you think public transport is better than travelling by car?

      4
      Get it scored
      Sample answerBand 8
      1. Upside
      2. Downside
      3. On balance

      Public transport has clear advantages for society as a whole, since a single bus or train can carry dozens of people using a fraction of the road space and fuel that all those cars would. From an individual's point of view, though, a car is hard to beat, because it takes you door to door whenever you like, which matters a lot if you're carrying shopping or travelling with small children. Taking both into account, public transport is the better choice in dense cities where it's frequent and reliable, but in rural areas the car is often the only practical option.

      society as a whole
      everyone together, rather than individuals
      hard to beat
      better than most alternatives
      door to door
      directly from your starting point to your destination

      101 words · about 44 seconds spoken

    3. Opinion

      What could be done to reduce traffic in busy areas?

      5
      Get it scored
      Sample answerBand 8
      1. My view
      2. Why
      3. Example
      4. But

      The most effective step, in my opinion, would be to make the alternatives so good that driving stops being the obvious choice. People rarely abandon their cars because they're told to, but they will switch if a train or bus is faster, cheaper and more comfortable. A city near mine introduced dedicated bus lanes and buses every few minutes on its main routes, and within a year the number of cars coming into the centre had dropped noticeably. Better transport takes years to build, however, so in the meantime measures like staggered working hours or letting more people work from home could ease the worst of the rush hour.

      stops being the obvious choice
      is no longer what people automatically choose
      in the meantime
      while waiting for something else to happen
      ease the worst of
      reduce the most serious part of

      109 words · about 47 seconds spoken

    Depth: the abstract and the future

    1. Opinion

      Should governments make it more expensive to drive private cars?

      6
      Get it scored
      Sample answerBand 8
      1. My view
      2. Why
      3. Example
      4. But

      I'm broadly in favour, as long as it's done fairly. At the moment, drivers don't pay for most of the damage they cause, such as congestion, pollution and road accidents, so raising the cost simply makes the price reflect reality. Several big cities have introduced a daily charge for driving into the centre, and traffic in those areas fell considerably soon afterwards. The danger, though, is that it turns driving into a privilege for the wealthy, so any extra charges should be paired with cheaper public transport and exemptions for people like carers or disabled drivers who genuinely need a car.

      broadly in favour
      generally supportive of an idea
      makes the price reflect reality
      makes the cost match the true harm
      a privilege for the wealthy
      something only rich people can enjoy

      101 words · about 44 seconds spoken

    2. The future

      How do you think people will travel in the future?

      7
      Get it scored
      Sample answerBand 8
      1. Prediction
      2. Because
      3. But

      I imagine cities will rely much more on electric and shared vehicles, and possibly self-driving taxis that you summon with your phone rather than owning a car yourself. Owning a car that sits parked for most of the day makes less and less sense as cities get more crowded, and the technology for sharing and automation is improving quickly. That said, predictions about transport have a habit of being wrong, and I wouldn't be surprised if the biggest change turned out to be something modest, like far more people cycling or just travelling less because they work remotely.

      makes less and less sense
      becomes increasingly unreasonable
      have a habit of being wrong
      often turn out to be incorrect
      I wouldn't be surprised if
      I think it is quite possible that

      98 words · about 43 seconds spoken

    3. What if

      If cars were banned from city centres, what would the effects be?

      8
      Get it scored
      Sample answerBand 8
      1. If so
      2. Result
      3. Wider effect

      If cars were kept out of city centres, the most immediate change would be streets that were quieter, safer and far more pleasant to stroll around. Shops and cafés would probably benefit from the extra foot traffic, and space that's currently taken up by parking could be turned into seating, trees and play areas. Further afield, though, it could push congestion onto the surrounding roads, and people who depend on driving, like delivery firms or elderly residents, would need well-designed exceptions, otherwise the centre could become harder to reach for the very people who need it most.

      the extra foot traffic
      more people walking past
      Further afield
      in places further away
      the very people who need it most
      exactly those with the greatest need

      97 words · about 42 seconds spoken

    4. Pros and cons

      Is it realistic to expect people to give up their cars?

      9
      Get it scored
      Sample answerBand 8
      1. Upside
      2. Downside
      3. On balance

      In big cities with good public transport, it's perfectly realistic, and in fact plenty of young people there are already choosing not to own one at all. Elsewhere, it's a much harder ask, because cars are tied up with freedom and status for many people, and in rural areas there's often no practical way to get to work or the shops without one. So rather than expecting people to give them up entirely, the more achievable goal is to get them using their cars less, perhaps for the occasional long trip rather than every short errand.

      a much harder ask
      something more difficult to request or achieve
      tied up with
      closely connected to
      the occasional long trip
      a long journey now and then

      96 words · about 42 seconds spoken

    Cue cards that lead into this discussion

    More Part 3 discussions